DesignScan #1951
Scanned 24 October 2026
robberthagens.nl
Your site is fast, well found, accessible, light on images and technically sound, but it looks about 10 years old. Verdict: looking good: polish, don’t rebuild.
Feels like 2016 8 UX findings, 0 critical 0.2 MB · 7 files
Looking good: polish, don’t rebuild
DesignGood
AgePoor
SpeedGood
SEOGood
ImagesGood
CodeGood
UXGood
Access.Good
TrustNeeds work
PeopleNeeds 3 votes
How it looks on every screen
Website Age: feels like 2016
Visitors today expect 2024 or newerFlexbox layout
2016
2016
Domain registered
2014 · not counted in the age
2014 · not counted in the age
UX Doctor: diagnosis & prescription
Sorted by impact on your score
Major
No clear action on the first phone screen
Rx: Show the main action (order, book, contact, quote) as a button in the first screen on phones.
PhoneEffort LowGain +3
Major
No privacy statement linked
Rx: Link a privacy statement in the footer: what you collect, why, and how to reach you. It’s required in the EU and builds trust everywhere.
FooterEffort LowGain +3
Major
10 broken links on the homepage
Rx: Fix or remove: robberthagens.nl/robberthagensnl (404), robberthagens.nl/redactionele-fotografie (404), robberthagens.nl/portret-fotografie (404) ….
AllEffort LowGain +3
+ 5 more findings in the full report
Sign up to unlock With effort and gain for each, a fix tracker, the PDF and a rescan after 30 days.
Speed
TTFB server response0.18 s
Weight whole page0.2 MB
Core Web Vitals appear here when the PageSpeed key is configured.
SEO & findability
✓Page title (57 characters)
✓Meta description
!0 main headings (H1)
✓Search engines may index this page
✓Sitemap found
!No structured data (schema.org)
✓AI crawlers may read the site
✓Secure https
77 %Better than 77 % of all websites scanned
#231 of 1019 · average score 59.3 · average site feels like 2016 Certificate › Watch this site ›
#231 of 1019 · average score 59.3 · average site feels like 2016 Certificate › Watch this site ›
Under the hood
Every measurement behind the score, how we measured it, and what we couldn’t.
75of 76 checks measured
3screens in a real browser
noGoogle PageSpeed
30 sscan time
24 Oct 2026scan #1951
Not measured in this scan: Core Web Vitals (Google PageSpeed was not run for this scan); body text contrast (colours are set in a way we can’t read reliably); the people score (needs 3 community votes, or GhostStat on the site). These parts count as neutral, never as a penalty.
Server & connection
HTTP statuswhat the server answered for the homepage200
Secure connectionbrowsers mark http sites as “not secure”https
Redirectseach hop costs a round trip before anything loads0
Server response (TTFB)time until the first byte, measured from our server0.18 s
HTML downloadthe HTML document only, without images and scripts0.50 s
HTML sizebig HTML often means inlined data or page-builder bloat100 KB
Page weight (estimated)HTML + the first 25 images, scripts and styles, by their reported size210 KB
Requestsfiles the browser has to fetch7
Mixed contenthttp files on an https page get blocked0
Server softwarefrom the Server headeradobe
Search & sharing
54 more checks: search, code and images, plus the browser tests and how the score was madeFree for members: see every measurement, download the raw data, and get told when your score changes.Sign up free Log in
Code & build
15 checks · for members
Images
8 checks · for members
Trust, freshness & security
18 checks · for members
The people’s verdict
1 community votes · Board of Three counted 5×
8.8/10
LAYER 2 · NOT CONNECTED YET
See what your real visitors do
Install GhostStat (one line, no cookies), and this report adds heatmaps, rage clicks, drop-off pages and intent scores from your real visitors.
Connect GhostStat, freeHeatmaps, recordings and funnels appear here after your first visitors arrive.
Want someone to fix it?
Open this report to designers and developers. They see the fix list and pitch with a price. You choose, and nobody gets your email until you do.